Should i buy a Samsung or Sharp tv? - sharp tv
I will buy a 32-inch LCD TV on for my PS3 and I can not decide about the Samsung LN32A550 or Sharp LC32D64U. Both are the same price and similar in terms of definition and other functions. The only major difference is that the Samsung has better contrast ratio of 5000 and the Sharp has better sound quality extra 5 watts per speaker. I am especially high-quality video-audio quality is not so good, I am with the Samsung TV? What do you think?
Monday, January 4, 2010
Sharp Tv Should I Buy A Samsung Or Sharp Tv?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
Ah, the A550 vs. Aquos D64 U .... I had exactly the same dilemma a month ago, with the exception of the 46 "models. Those who originally bought the A550 with a package home theater system for $ 1799 at Future Shop as a wedding gift for my brother. 'S Day delivery to the leg of its holdings, so he went to the Aquos D64 U is very similar spec wise, but save a little more expensive.
Both displays are excellent, but the A550 is more recent (March 2008), while the D64 U is a model of aging. Samsungs tend to look much brighter and more alive than many people who are attracted to them in the showroom. However, they are slightly lighter and can irritate the eyes after a time display. The Sharp is not so overwhelming and the colors are neutral and more "film like". And yes, the speakers should surpass on the Sharp TV.
Personally, I could live happily with either, although I prefer the thin bezel Aquos. The Samsung has a black bezel rough, but interesting, luster, but somehow the visible portion of the screen is appear to be relativelying smaller ...
Ah, the A550 vs. Aquos D64 U .... I had exactly the same dilemma a month ago, with the exception of the 46 "models. Those who originally bought the A550 with a package home theater system for $ 1799 at Future Shop as a wedding gift for my brother. 'S Day delivery to the leg of its holdings, so he went to the Aquos D64 U is very similar spec wise, but save a little more expensive.
Both displays are excellent, but the A550 is more recent (March 2008), while the D64 U is a model of aging. Samsungs tend to look much brighter and more alive than many people who are attracted to them in the showroom. However, they are slightly lighter and can irritate the eyes after a time display. The Sharp is not so overwhelming and the colors are neutral and more "film like". And yes, the speakers should surpass on the Sharp TV.
Personally, I could live happily with either, although I prefer the thin bezel Aquos. The Samsung has a black bezel rough, but interesting, luster, but somehow the visible portion of the screen is appear to be relativelying smaller ...
the 550 is better compare reports on the use of television for the price.
Do your research Samsung is the best on the market ..
Make sure you always purchase a protection agreement with a TV, so wherever you go. I know the 5000 is not really a big difference, but Sharp is not bad.
But Samsung is the right way
Get the Samsung and connect the PS3 with an HDMI cable. Not for nothing, 5 watts is really not much, and if the sound is always treated, you can connect to your stereo or buy a decent stereo tabletop $ 100.
Sony, Samsung and Sharp are the 3 largest producers of TV sales, and I think he is wise in that order. I have a Sharp LCD 32 water that is awsome. Samsung seems to be a little more expensive than the Sharp, but has the three big television.
Post a Comment